Ross Hilton Kemper: Lawsuits, Eden ROC Bankruptcy, and Current Legal Status
Ross Hilton Kemper is an entrepreneur and investor whose name appears in several recent court proceedings involving real estate, business debt, bankruptcy, and personal guarantees. Cornell’s SC Johnson College of Business describes Kemper as having more than 25 years of experience across real estate, media and entertainment, and consumer health and beauty. His recent court record, however, involves several legally separate disputes that can easily become mixed together in search results.
One major proceeding concerns Eden ROC Holdings LLC, a company that filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy in California in June 2026 with a Beverly Hills residence identified as its principal asset. The bankruptcy court dismissed the case in September 2026 and imposed a 180-day bar preventing Eden ROC from filing another bankruptcy case during the restricted period. Eden ROC filed an appeal the following day, and the bankruptcy docket still reflected appeal-related activity in October.
A completely separate New York case involves CION Investment Corporation, Atlas Supply LLC, and Kemper personally as guarantor. The federal court granted CION judgment on the pleadings in April 2026 concerning a $5 million business loan. The ruling established liability on CION’s two claims, while the amount of damages, interest, costs, and enforcement expenses required additional calculation.
What to know
- Ross Hilton Kemper is publicly described as an entrepreneur and investor with extensive real-estate experience.
- Eden ROC Holdings LLC filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy in California on June 19, 2026.
- Its principal asset was reported as a single-family residence at 1115 La Altura Road in Beverly Hills.
- The bankruptcy court dismissed Eden ROC’s case on September 23, 2026 and barred the company from refiling bankruptcy for 180 days.
- Eden ROC filed an appeal from the dismissal on September 24, 2026.
- Ross Kemper, Linda Kemper, and Eden ROC also appear in a California property dispute involving Hankey Capital and Chicago Title.
- In a separate New York federal case, Kemper was sued as personal guarantor of Atlas Supply LLC’s $5 million CION loan.
- The New York court granted CION judgment on the pleadings on April 28, 2026.
- CION alleged approximately $5.915 million in damages before additional interest, fees, costs, and expenses, but the April ruling required a further damages calculation.
Who Is Ross Hilton Kemper?
Ross Hilton Kemper is publicly described as an entrepreneur and investor. The Cornell SC Johnson College of Business profile for Ross Hilton Kemper says he has more than 25 years of experience in real estate, media and entertainment, and consumer health and beauty in the United States and Europe. It also describes investment activity involving hotels, retail property, casinos, offices, apartments, shopping centers, and land.
That business background helps explain why court searches can return several companies and transactions associated with his name. It does not mean those businesses are legally interchangeable. Each lawsuit still needs to be examined according to the entity involved, the contract or property at issue, and Kemper’s particular role.
For that reason, a simple biography is not enough to answer the current search intent for Ross Hilton Kemper. Recent search results lead directly into bankruptcy, foreclosure, secured lending, and guaranty litigation. The useful question is not only who Kemper is, but how those proceedings differ.
What Is Eden ROC Holdings LLC?
Eden ROC Holdings LLC filed a voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California on June 19, 2026. Bankruptcy records identify a single-family residence at 1115 La Altura Road in Beverly Hills as the company’s principal asset. The petition reported estimated assets and liabilities ranging from $10 million to $50 million.
Ross Kemper signed the petition as manager of Eden ROC Holdings LLC. That fact connects him to the case but does not make him the named bankruptcy debtor. The limited liability company is the debtor.
This distinction is important for accurate reporting. Saying “Ross Kemper filed personal bankruptcy” would go beyond the court record reviewed for this case. A more accurate statement is that Eden ROC Holdings LLC filed Chapter 11 and Kemper signed for the company as manager.
Chapter 11 is a federal bankruptcy process commonly used by businesses seeking to reorganize debts, restructure obligations, or manage assets under bankruptcy-court supervision. Filing can trigger an automatic stay against many collection actions, although creditors can ask the court for relief and a judge can dismiss a case that does not meet bankruptcy requirements. Filing Chapter 11 therefore does not guarantee that the debtor will obtain a confirmed reorganization plan.
For general background on bankruptcy procedure, TheLawLearner’s guide on how to file bankruptcy without a lawyer explains concepts such as the automatic stay, dismissal, secured debts, and court deadlines. That guide focuses mainly on individual bankruptcy rather than a business Chapter 11 case. Use it for general context, not as a substitute for the rules governing Eden ROC.
Why Did the Eden ROC Bankruptcy Matter?
The bankruptcy was significant because Eden ROC’s main reported asset was valuable Beverly Hills real estate. Separate public records and litigation connect the property with secured financing and foreclosure activity involving Hankey Capital. A bankruptcy filing can affect a creditor’s ability to continue certain collection or foreclosure steps because of the federal automatic stay.
However, the automatic stay does not permanently protect against foreclosure. A creditor can ask the bankruptcy court for relief from the stay, challenge the case, or seek dismissal. If the case is dismissed, bankruptcy protections can end unless another effective court order changes the result.
Hankey Capital filed a motion to dismiss the Eden ROC bankruptcy with a 180-day bar on refiling. The court ultimately entered a dismissal order containing that restriction in September. As a result, Eden ROC could not treat Chapter 11 as an ongoing reorganization after that date.
Was the Eden ROC Bankruptcy Dismissed?
Yes. The bankruptcy docket shows an order dismissing the Eden ROC Holdings LLC Chapter 11 case on September 23, 2026. The same order imposed a special restriction preventing Eden ROC from filing another bankruptcy case for 180 days.
The docket gives the restriction period as September 23, 2026 through March 22, 2027. That feature makes the order more significant than an ordinary dismissal without an immediate-refiling restriction. During the stated period, Eden ROC cannot simply commence another bankruptcy case to obtain a new bankruptcy proceeding.
Dismissal does not by itself erase the company’s debts or decide every separate property dispute. It ends the bankruptcy proceeding subject to the consequences of the order and any effective appellate relief. Foreclosure, contract, lien, and state-court issues can continue under their own legal rules.
A bankruptcy dismissal ends the bankruptcy case before the debtor completes the bankruptcy process it sought. Dismissal usually means the debtor does not obtain the reorganization or discharge that might otherwise result from a successful case, and bankruptcy protections may end. The underlying debt or separate state-law claims normally do not disappear simply because the bankruptcy proceeding has been dismissed.
What Does the 180-Day Bankruptcy Bar Mean?
The order prevents Eden ROC Holdings LLC from filing another bankruptcy case during the stated 180-day period. According to the docket, the restriction extends through March 22, 2027. This matters because another qualifying bankruptcy filing could create new bankruptcy protections, subject to federal repeat-filing rules.
Courts can impose refiling restrictions when circumstances justify limiting rapid successive bankruptcy petitions. Such restrictions can be particularly important when bankruptcy filings overlap with scheduled foreclosure activity. Their purpose and legal basis depend on the circumstances and the actual dismissal order.
The restriction should not automatically be described as a personal bankruptcy ban against Ross Hilton Kemper. Eden ROC Holdings LLC is the debtor identified in this bankruptcy case and in the refiling restriction reflected on the docket. Kemper’s involvement as manager does not change the named debtor.
Did Eden ROC Appeal the Bankruptcy Dismissal?
Yes. Eden ROC filed a notice of appeal on September 24, 2026, one day after the dismissal order. The matter was referred to the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit and assigned appellate number CC-26-1215.
The bankruptcy docket showed additional appeal-related activity on September 25. On October 15, it also showed a deficiency notice stating that a statement of issues, designation of record, and notice concerning transcripts had not been filed in the bankruptcy docket record reflected by that notice. That is procedural information and should not be confused with an appellate decision on whether the dismissal was legally correct.
The careful current description is therefore that the Chapter 11 case was dismissed and Eden ROC appealed the dismissal. The docket material reviewed for this article did not show a later appellate ruling reversing the dismissal. Filing an appeal alone does not mean the appellant has won.
Dismissed does not mean the appeal disappeared
The bankruptcy court entered a dismissal order, while Eden ROC separately filed an appeal from that order. Those statements are not contradictory because a trial-level order can remain the operative ruling while appellate review is sought. An appeal also does not automatically reverse or suspend the challenged order simply because the notice of appeal was filed.
What Is the Dispute With Hankey Capital?
Hankey Capital appears in the Eden ROC bankruptcy as a creditor and also appears in related California property litigation. Public records associate the dispute with the residence at 1115 La Altura Road in Beverly Hills. That overlap explains why Hankey Capital, Eden ROC, and the Kemper name repeatedly appear together.
A California case index shows that Eden ROC Holdings LLC, Ross Hilton Kemper, and Linda Kerkorian Kemper filed a proceeding against Hankey Capital LLC and Chicago Title Company on September 17, 2026. The index describes it as foreclosure relief and summarizes the complaint as involving a pre-sale petition concerning the Beverly Hills property. Because this information comes from a case index rather than a final judgment, the plaintiffs’ position should be described as a claim, not a proven legal violation.
The filing itself does not establish that Hankey Capital or Chicago Title acted unlawfully. Plaintiffs begin a lawsuit by asserting claims that defendants can contest. A reliable article should therefore distinguish between what the plaintiffs alleged and what a court has actually decided.
How Is Kemper Connected to the Beverly Hills Property?
Public property and litigation records connect Ross Hilton Kemper and Linda Kerkorian Kemper with the property through trust-related arrangements. Eden ROC’s bankruptcy records also identify the same Beverly Hills residence as the company’s principal asset. Those overlapping records help explain why a search for Kemper returns both family-trust references and Eden ROC court filings.
Kemper’s capacity matters. A person can act as an LLC manager in one transaction, a trustee in another, and an individual litigant in a third. Those legal roles are not interchangeable merely because the same person’s name appears in each record.
This is especially relevant when discussing ownership or debt. A debt secured against property, an LLC obligation, and a personal guaranty can create very different legal consequences. Accurate reporting should identify which document and legal capacity support each statement.
Why Ross Hilton Kemper appears in different capacities
| Matter | Role shown in available records |
|---|---|
| Eden ROC bankruptcy | Manager who signed the company’s Chapter 11 petition. |
| California property records | Appears in trust-related documents concerning the Beverly Hills property. |
| California Hankey litigation | Plaintiff together with Eden ROC Holdings LLC and Linda Kerkorian Kemper. |
| CION / Atlas Supply case | Individual defendant and personal guarantor of Atlas Supply’s obligations. |
What Is the CION Investment Case Against Ross Hilton Kemper?
The CION case is legally separate from the Eden ROC bankruptcy and Beverly Hills dispute. CION Investment Corporation sued Atlas Supply LLC and Ross Hilton Kemper in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The April 28, 2026 federal opinion in CION Investment Corporation v. Atlas Supply LLC describes Atlas as borrower and Kemper as personal guarantor.
According to the opinion, CION entered into a $5 million loan agreement with Atlas Supply on April 29, 2022. The court said Kemper, described in the opinion as Atlas’s sole member, executed a guaranty covering Atlas’s obligations. The loan matured a April 29, 2025.
CION alleged defaults, including missed obligations and failure to provide required financial information. When the outstanding obligation remained unpaid at maturity, CION sent another demand for payment. The lawsuit followed in August 2025.
How Much Money Did CION Say Was Owed?
CION alleged damages of $5,914,673.61, plus accruing interest, default interest, additional late-payment fees, attorneys’ fees, costs, expenses, and other amounts permitted under the agreements. The same alleged amount formed the basis of the claim against Kemper under the guaranty. That figure came from CION’s pleaded damages before the court completed the later damages process.
Do not report $5,914,673.61 as though the April 28 opinion itself entered that exact final judgment amount. The court granted judgment on the pleadings as to both counts but ordered CION to submit a proposed calculation of damages and costs within 14 days. The defendants were given seven days to respond to that calculation.
That distinction improves legal accuracy. The April ruling established CION’s entitlement to judgment on the claims addressed by the motion. Calculating the amount owed was a further step.
Why Did the Court Grant Judgment on the Pleadings?
Atlas Supply and Kemper filed an answer denying their obligations and asserting affirmative defenses. According to the April opinion, however, they did not respond to CION’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The judge still explained that an unopposed Rule 12(c) motion must be decided on its legal merits, not granted automatically.
The court considered the complaint, answer, loan documents, guaranty, and other materials incorporated into the pleadings. It noted that the defendants did not deny several important facts, including receiving the maturity demand and failing to repay the outstanding obligations at maturity. The court ultimately held that CION was entitled to judgment on both its claim against Atlas and its guaranty claim against Kemper.
This is stronger than saying only that CION “filed a lawsuit.” The federal judge actually issued an opinion granting CION’s motion on liability. What remained afterward included calculating the monetary award contemplated by the court’s order.
Judgment on the pleadings allows a court to decide a claim after the pleadings have closed when no material factual dispute is shown by those pleadings that prevents judgment as a matter of law. The court generally considers the complaint, answer, and documents properly incorporated into them without conducting a full trial. A Rule 12(c) judgment is therefore more than an allegation in a complaint, although later proceedings may still be necessary to calculate damages or address other remaining issues.
Did Ross Hilton Kemper Personally Guarantee the Atlas Supply Loan?
Yes, according to the federal opinion. The court described Kemper as Atlas Supply’s sole member and stated that he executed a guaranty associated with the loan. The guaranty obligated him to guarantee payment and performance of Atlas’s obligations under the loan agreement.
That personal guaranty is why CION could pursue Kemper individually rather than suing only Atlas Supply. A limited liability company normally separates the company from its owner, but a voluntarily signed personal guaranty can create a separate contractual obligation. The guaranty must still be interpreted according to its terms and governing law.
This is also why the CION matter should not be confused with Eden ROC’s bankruptcy. In CION, the federal court expressly addressed a contractual personal guaranty. Eden ROC’s bankruptcy, by contrast, identifies the LLC itself as the bankruptcy debtor.
Is Ross Hilton Kemper Personally Bankrupt?
The Eden ROC case does not establish that Ross Hilton Kemper filed for personal bankruptcy. The petition identifies Eden ROC Holdings LLC as the debtor and shows Kemper signing in a representative capacity as manager. That is a company bankruptcy.
A personal guaranty judgment in another case also does not automatically create a personal bankruptcy case. Bankruptcy requires an actual petition filed by or against the relevant debtor under federal bankruptcy law. The court records reviewed here should not be stretched beyond what they show.
This distinction matters for search results and headlines. “Company managed by Kemper files Chapter 11” and “Kemper files personal bankruptcy” are materially different statements. The first is supported by the Eden ROC record; the second is not.
Are the CION and Eden ROC Cases Connected?
They share Kemper’s involvement, but the available court records show different transactions. The CION lawsuit concerns Atlas Supply LLC, a $5 million loan, and Kemper’s personal guaranty. The Eden ROC case involves a different LLC, a Beverly Hills property, bankruptcy, and creditor issues associated with Hankey Capital.
The creditors are also different. CION Investment Corporation is the plaintiff in the New York loan case, while Hankey Capital appears in the California property and bankruptcy dispute. A judgment involving one creditor does not establish liability to the other.
Combining the two cases into one debt story would therefore be misleading. A profile article can discuss both because people searching Ross Hilton Kemper are likely to encounter both proceedings. It should still keep the legal findings and amounts separate.
Ross Hilton Kemper Legal Timeline
Major recent court developments
| Date | Development |
|---|---|
| April 29, 2022 | CION enters a $5 million loan agreement with Atlas Supply LLC, with Kemper executing a guaranty. |
| June 7, 2024 | CION sends notice of asserted events of default under the Atlas Supply loan. |
| April 29, 2025 | The Atlas Supply loan reaches its stated maturity date. |
| August 28, 2025 | CION files its federal contract lawsuit against Atlas Supply and Ross Hilton Kemper. |
| April 28, 2026 | The federal court grants CION judgment on the pleadings on both counts and orders further damages calculations. |
| June 19, 2026 | Eden ROC Holdings LLC files Chapter 11 bankruptcy in California. |
| September 17, 2026 | Eden ROC, Ross Kemper, and Linda Kemper file a California proceeding involving Hankey Capital and Chicago Title. |
| September 23, 2026 | The bankruptcy court dismisses Eden ROC’s Chapter 11 case with a 180-day bar on refiling. |
| September 24, 2026 | Eden ROC appeals the bankruptcy dismissal. |
| October 15, 2026 | The bankruptcy docket reflects a deficiency notice concerning required appeal-related materials. |
What Is the Current Status of the Eden ROC Case?
The clearest current trial-level result is the September 23 bankruptcy dismissal. The order dismissed Eden ROC for 180 days and identified March 22, 2027, as the end of the stated restricted period. Eden ROC filed a notice of appeal the next day.
The latest bankruptcy docket activity reviewed for this article was dated October 15, 2026. That entry concerned missing appeal-related items, not a ruling reversing the dismissal. As of the law-current-through date of October 31, the available material reviewed here did not establish that the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel had reversed the September dismissal.
The safest publication wording is therefore straightforward. Eden ROC’s Chapter 11 case was dismissed, the company appealed, and the appeal had not produced a reversal in the docket material reviewed for this article. That wording avoids treating either the dismissal or the appeal as though the other did not exist.
What Is the Current Status of the CION Case?
The most significant published ruling is the April 28, 2026 order granting CION judgment on the pleadings against both Atlas Supply LLC and Kemper. The court held that CION was entitled to judgment on the loan and guaranty claims presented in the motion. It then ordered a separate submission concerning damages, costs, interest, and enforcement expenses.
CION’s complaint alleged $5,914,673.61 in damages before continuing amounts. That figure should be identified as the amount alleged in the pleadings, not automatically as the final monetary judgment. The April opinion itself makes clear that another calculation was required.
This difference is easy to lose in short case summaries. “CION won judgment on the pleadings” is supported by the federal opinion. “The April 28 order entered a final $5,914,673.61 judgment” is not the same statement and should not be made without the later damages order.
Why Search Results for Ross Hilton Kemper Can Be Confusing
The search term combines biography, bankruptcy, foreclosure records, trusts, corporate entities, and personal contractual liability. Search engines may place those materials side by side without explaining which court or company each document belongs to. That can make unrelated debts appear connected.
Kemper also appears in different legal roles depending on the record. He can be an LLC manager, trust-related party, state-court plaintiff, company owner, or individual guarantor. A person’s role controls far more than the mere appearance of the same name.
The best way to read these cases is therefore to ask four questions each time: Which company is involved? Which creditor is involved? What court is deciding the issue? In what legal capacity does Kemper appear? Those questions prevent most of the confusion surrounding the search term.
Conclusion
Ross Hilton Kemper is an entrepreneur and investor whose name appears in several recent court proceedings, but those proceedings should not be treated as one lawsuit. Eden ROC Holdings LLC filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy in June 2026, identified a Beverly Hills residence as its principal asset, and had its bankruptcy case dismissed on September 23 with a 180-day refiling restriction. Eden ROC appealed that dismissal the following day.
The California property dispute creates another layer because Eden ROC, Ross Kemper, and Linda Kemper filed a proceeding involving Hankey Capital and Chicago Title. That case concerns claims associated with the Beverly Hills property, but filing a complaint does not establish that the defendants committed wrongdoing. Its allegations and later rulings should remain separate from the bankruptcy court’s dismissal order.
The CION matter is different again. CION sued Atlas Supply LLC and Kemper personally under a $5 million loan and guaranty, and the federal court granted CION judgment on the pleadings in April 2026. CION alleged more than $5.9 million in damages plus continuing amounts, but the court ordered a further damages calculation, so the alleged amount should not be confused with the precise final amount of an April 28 judgment.
Frequently asked questions
Who is Ross Hilton Kemper?
Ross Hilton Kemper is an entrepreneur and investor whose public Cornell profile describes more than 25 years of experience in real estate and other business sectors. His name appears in several recent court records involving companies, property, loans, and personal guarantees. Those matters involve different transactions and should not be treated as one lawsuit.
Did Ross Hilton Kemper personally file bankruptcy?
The bankruptcy discussed in this article was filed by Eden ROC Holdings LLC rather than Ross Hilton Kemper as an individual debtor. Kemper signed the Chapter 11 petition as Eden ROC’s manager. The company bankruptcy therefore should not be described as proof that Kemper personally filed Chapter 11.
What happened to the Eden ROC Holdings bankruptcy?
Eden ROC Holdings LLC filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy on June 19, 2026. The court dismissed the case on September 23 and imposed a 180-day restriction preventing Eden ROC from filing another bankruptcy case during the restricted period. Eden ROC appealed the dismissal the next day, and the docket continued to show appeal-related activity in October.
What is the dispute involving Hankey Capital?
Hankey Capital appears as a creditor in the Eden ROC bankruptcy and in litigation connected with the Beverly Hills property at 1115 La Altura Road. Eden ROC, Ross Kemper, and Linda Kemper filed a California proceeding against Hankey Capital and Chicago Title in September 2026. The filing states the plaintiffs’ claims, but those allegations should not be treated as proven wrongdoing unless supported by a later court ruling.
What happened in the CION case against Ross Hilton Kemper?
CION Investment Corporation sued Atlas Supply LLC and Ross Hilton Kemper concerning a $5 million loan and Kemper’s personal guaranty. On April 28, 2026, the federal court granted CION judgment on the pleadings on both counts. CION alleged approximately $5.915 million in damages plus additional amounts, but the judge ordered CION to submit a further calculation of damages, interest, costs, and enforcement expenses.
